Dark Energy

Coming Soon

Casimir Effect

Time and Energy

Time and Energy have a very romantic relationship. How much time does it take for energy to reach zero? How long can a humans go without food before dying? How long can you drive before you run out of gas?

Energy has a time limit before it becomes fully used, fully dissipated, fully dispersed. The more energy something has, (i.e.; the quicker it dissipates), then the shorter amount of a time it has before it's annihilated. The less energy something has, (i.e.; the slower it dissipates), then the longer it has to exist. 

Simply stated: the less time, the more energy, or the the more time, the less energy. Think of the difference between an explosion or a slow burning fire.

When spacetime was near zero, energy was near infinite, but in the future we are moving toward a state where spacetime will be near infinite and energy will near zero.

But according to the laws of quantum mechanics energy can never actually be zero. But, can spacetime never actually be zero either?

Virtual Particles 

Virtual particles somehow borrow energy from spacetime based on the possibility of a non-zero state. If spacetime can never be zero, it can create a force of energy, but the force of energy must eventually return it back into the spacetime.  

The more energy a particle borrows, the less time it has to pay it back, less time it can exist. Another way to think of it is that the more massive the particle, the less time that can exist

Large things that are as massive as celestial bodies disappear so quickly that they don't exist at all if they were made of virtual particles. Small mass and low energy particles are what can exist for a longer time.

What is essentially happening is that energy is spending itself to have longer time to exist. This seems to suggest that infinite energy can never really exist because only energy moving toward zero (zero  being complete dissipation of energy) can cause time to be created. If energy was infinite, spacetime would be zero and vise-versa - if/when spacetime becomes infinite, energy will be zero. 

When a virtual particle is created, popping into existence out of seemingly the nothingness of space, particle and anti-particle pairs are created. Since, all particles are essentially just excitations in quantum fields that means all particles have some determinable wavelength. 

Particle pairs with longer wavelengths can not manifest inside of a space shorter than it's wavelength. That means that there can be a measurable effect. Because more wavelengths can exist outside of a small space than inside of a small space, this should cause a small force to be exerted inward on the small space. This force would be slightly stronger than the outward force created from virtual particles in the small space. This eventually causes the small space to close. This is called the Casimir Effect. 

However, if this effect is happening everywhere in every single place in spacetime, it would lead to an infinite mass density. This is obviously not true because if it were, we would be in a completely different kind of universe. So it must be that the Casimir Effect does not compound over time. 

Why not?

Imagine you have a force of 100 that only last for 1 second and then you had a force of 1 that lasted for 100 seconds. A force of 1 would have a very long stretched out wavelength, while a force of 100 would have very short, compressed wave length. It's the compression of the wavelength that determines the strength of the force. 

If you are talking about a small space, there are only finite values of wave sizes that can fit in a smaller space, but on the bigger space outside of the small space can exist a bigger variation of wavelengths. This effect only exists on small scales because bigger wavelengths sharply decrease in strength as they become bigger and more stretched out.  

How do virtual particles become real by splitting into particle and anti-particle pairs?

The Dynamical Casimir effect happens around blackholes.

Because blackholes generate a gravitational pull that pulls on real particles faster than what they can physically travel, when real particle-anti particle pairs are created by virtual particles, one particle will be pulled into the black hole, while the other could potentially escape.

However, energy isn't just being created from nothing, black holes are actually converting their mass into particle-anti particle pairs. This is also called Hawking Radiation. 

So, what does all this mean exactly? Allow me to extrapolate a little. 

Fact 1. - There is no true void. Everywhere on the smallest scales exist a frothing, foamy soup of virtual particles popping in and out of existence from seemingly nothing

Fact 2 - the more energetic ones have shorter lives, the less energetic ones have the longer lives.

Fact 3 - it's a virtual particle because it's really not there, only it's force is detected when being split into particle-antiparticle pairs.

Fact 4 - Particle/antiparticle pairs are always on trajectory to self annihilate, unless otherwise pulled a part.

Fact 5 - High gravitational forces are what it takes to keep particle pairs from annihilating. 

Acceleration and Gravity 

Gravity and Acceleration are indistinguishable effects. When you accelerate you feel a force equal to that laying on the surface of some equal-to-acceleration-in-mass object. 

Remember

      Force = Mass * Acceleration ( F=MA )

or 

Mass = Force/Acceleration or  Acc = Force/Mass

M  =  F   / A          A  =   F   /  M
5 =  100 / 20        20  = 100 / 5
10 = 100 / 10       40 =  100 / 2.5

Force can always stay the same as long as Mass and Acceleration stay balanced. 

As the video explains, with this understanding of nature, a device has been created that can separate self-annihilating particles for longer periods of time. But, if Black holes exchange their mass for particle anti-particle pairs, what mass is hidden in the universe that is creating the universe's virtual particles?

The best conclusion is that Universe is a black hole. 

Big Bang

Big Bang?  

This is a dirty word for some people, kind of like saying 'Filet Mignons for free' at a vegan living community, but the Big Bang is simply a description based an extrapolation of consistent, known facts of reality.





Here are the facts (The 10 Factmandments)

Fact 1 - The space between moving objects is getting bigger on larger scales. (space appears to be expanding)

Fact 2 -  The space between moving objects on smaller scales has a limit defined by the Plank scale.

Fact 3 - The limit on smaller scales is called a singularity inside of black holes.

Fact 4 - Black holes eventually radiate away to thermal equilibrium after an eternal-like amount of time.

Fact 5 - The universe as a whole is moving toward thermal equilibrium

Fact 6 - Entropy is always increasing, temperature is always going down, un-purposeful disorder becomes more probable,

Fact 7 - Quantum Particles can be entangled and exhibit non-locality movement.

Fact 8 - Quantum Particles can behave as probabilities and not just binary defined causal actions.

Fact 9 - Mass is nothing more than contained accelerating particles bounded by forces in a immensely small repeating space.

Fact 10 - Mass has an attraction to other masses called gravity.



Extreme Forces




The Big Bang is a place where temperatures would be unimaginably high, energy would be so intense that nothing could react, everything would be destroyed before it could even have a chance to exist or manifest into something interesting.

Extreme temperatures and forces would create a massively powerful force. Everything would be so hot and so fast that time wouldn't even make any sense.

Imagine yourself walking, pacing back and forth in small square box; image you always bounce off the barrier, because your force is contained by a much stronger force, which is whatever the box would be made of. Maybe, its made up of an elastic, spring-like material that would just always bounce the force back.

Image if you could accelerate at an exponential rate, or that the box was shrinking at an exponential rate, or even both. You would eventually reach the speed of light; you would eventually catch up with your own atoms in spacetime.

However, the only way to do such a thing would be to go so fast that all the particles in your body would experience a quantum leap, where you experience non-locality. This would seemingly either create an extra mass or it would either divide the mass into.

Energy can not be created nor destroyed so it couldn't be the former. However, dividing a mass like that would more than likely just create a massive explosion that would create an outward force, bursting past the force that was keeping it contained. But what if it couldn't? What if the explosion had no where to go?

The only answer would be into another dimension or region of space time thats connected through a wormhole. This is the impression that modern day science has reached. It's possible that black holes and the big bang are two sides of the same coin. 

Atomic

What does it mean to be Atomic?





Atomic is simply the adjective form of Atom. 



Atomic often refers to the energy contained inside of a object that is unimaginable small. How small? you ask. Watch this: 




So, when people talk about going atomic to describe how angry a person gets or crazily out of control someone gets, they are referring to the energy of space that is insanely densely packed with matter.



Maybe, going atomic is like too many densely packed negative thoughts in your brain at once. Thus, people like atoms, can have any little thing that disturbs it's stability, causing an explosion.